...ah yes, the (little remembered) stubborn chorus from Meredith Wilson's The Music Man. Professor Harold Hill has come to town, not with instruments and band uniforms, but with laptops for seventh and eighth graders. Oh yes, we've got Trouble...right here in River City! That starts with "T" and rhymes with "C" and stands for Computers!! OK, enough already...
A wave of the Dragon's Tail to Doug Petch for bringing the Iowa initiative to my attention with his scoop of the Sioux City Journal Online: Initiative aimed at expanding laptop computers in Iowa schools. Iowa is just another state willing to invest (a whopping half million dollars...forget what I said about "nothing half way") in an experiment to measure the success of having laptops in the hands of students...no results yet, but a "learning technology commission" to study the programs is included in the price tag *gasp*. At the bottom of the article is what I perceive to be the untold story:
The Iowa State Education Association opposed the plan."Technology is great, but we think there are some higher priorities than that," said Brad Hudson, a lobbyist for the union that represents most public schoolteachers.
"We doubt that 30 computers in a classroom are going to make a class any better if there isn't a highly trained person in the classroom (my emphasis)," he said.
Unfortunately, I believe Mr. Hudson may have hit the nail on the head...where are the highly trained individuals in the classrooms who know how to integrate the technology available via laptops into the learning environment? If getting those individuals into the classroom is one of Mr. Hudson's higher priorities, then I am behind him. If that highly trained individual is not the teacher...then perhaps that highly trained person comes in the package of one of those 13 and 14 year olds seated in front of the teacher, but let's not consider that partnership...yet.
The trials in Maine, Michigan, Massachusetts (and a few other non-"M" states) are not over and the results are not in. Doug Petch leans toward the optimistic view that laptops are good for students...I do not completely disagree, I just want the "good for what?" part better defined...and I would prefer that it be defined by a highly trained educator rather than a computer vendor or lawmaker...or...perhaps Professor Hill is available: "Yes, we've got trouble, trouble, trouble..."