Belmont University

March 29, 2007

Angel Tax Credits Gain Momentum

As we have been predicting, the federal government is moving to implement legislation that moves us toward a policy of socialized entrepreneurship. The National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship reports that Access to Capital for Entrepreneurs (ACE) Act of 2007 is moving forward. Why is this bad? It sets up a system that creates the potential of government picking winners and bureaucrats using the entrepreneurial economy as a tool for social engineering. Instead, we should let markets work.

The bill gives tax credits for investment in small businesses. Simple enough as it is written now. But we all know what happens. First there almost certainly will be amendments to this bill as it progresses. Then this bill will be used as a platform over time to micro manage free enterprise for various other agendas by amending the original bill and linking it to other legislation. If you don't believe me, just look at how the definition of "small business" and various small business support programs have been politicized to offer special favors to specific industries and groups of people over time.


March 28, 2007

Could the AMT be the Trigger for Real Tax Reform?

I am writing this post before I know if I will be one of the millions of Americans who will be snared in the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) trap this year. I need to make that clear before I say this. I believe that the only scenario that might create the possibility for true tax reform is if the current system suddenly creates significant pain for a large number of citizens. Such wide spread pain might create the scenario where we see millions of Americans spontaneously rise up and say "enough is enough." The AMT crisis that is looming on the horizon, in which millions of Americans will be hit with a huge unexpected tax bill, may be the event that takes America to the tipping point on tax reform.

We are not going to win the hearts and the minds of the average American with our economic and philosophical arguments on the virtue of creating a new tax system. Such fundamental change almost always has a strong emotional trigger. The system we have now has been able to win over the vast majority of people by offering each their own little perceived tax break. Home owners get their mortgage interest deduction. Good citizens get their charitable giving deductions. But, what if instantly these "personal" breaks disappear? That is what the AMT is just now beginning to trigger for millions of average tax payers. Instantly their little special interest breaks vanish and they experience the true nature of the system as it now exists.

So, even though I may well be one of the victims of the AMT this year or sometime in the near future, I believe that those members of Congress who want true tax reform should resist the temptation to go along with the current proposals to repeal the AMT. Let the AMT stay in place. Let it snare millions of Americans. And only then might we have their hearts and minds and be able to move toward a new and fairer system, which our entrepreneurial economy desperately needs if we want long term economic prosperity.


March 27, 2007

Does Silicon Valley have a Special "It"

From the SBA Office of Advocacy:

Many observers have long claimed there is something special about Silicon Valley that promotes entrepreneurship. Are these claims true? Is Silicon Valley more entrepreneurial, and if so, is there a special "it" factor, or are the rates due to factors already known to produce entrepreneurs? A study released today by the Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration answers these questions by showing that while high, Silicon Valley's entrepreneurship rates are not unique, although the factors that drive them may be.

Entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley during the Boom and Bust, written by Dr. Robert Fairlie of the University of California Santa Cruz with funding from the Office of Advocacy, examines the reasons for the rates of entrepreneurship in the dot com boom and post-boom periods.

The study found that Silicon Valley's entrepreneurship rate, as measured by the Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity, was consistently higher than the national rate during the dot com boom of the late 1990s. However, several other Metropolitan Statistical Areas had higher rates of entrepreneurship during the same period.

The Silicon Valley rate rose in the post-boom period, suggesting that the tight labor market, high wages, and available stock options suppressed entrepreneurship. After controlling for factors such as education and native/non-native birth, the Silicon Valley rate remained high, lending credence to the idea that Silicon Valley has a special, unmeasured factor that drives entrepreneurship.

My best guess is that there was a convergence of money and talent that happened at just the right time. Just like any success story, there may have been more than a little luck involved -- in fact, luck may be the mysterious "it" factor in the Silicon Valley story.


The Need for Tort Reform

Our legal system has created a lottery-like system out of our tort law. And many entrepreneurs end up being among the payors of the big winnings created by this mess.

The American Justice Partnership has released a new study this morning, Jackpot Justice: The True Cost of America's Tort System, that reveals some startling statistics.

America's out-of-control legal system imposes a staggering economic cost of over $865 billion every year according to a new scholarly study released today by the Pacific Research Institute (PRI), a free-market think tank based in San Francisco, California. This figure is 27 times more than the federal government spends on homeland security, 30 times what the National Institutes for Health dedicate to finding cures for deadly diseases, and 13 times the amount the Department of Education spends to help educate America's children.

Here is a link to the full report and here is a link to a video of Dr. McQuillan, lead author of this tort system study.


March 26, 2007

"Boing Boing" Economics

James Pethokoukis at US News posed the interesting question on how to make America more innovative. He has summarized the responses from a variety of people including Cory Doctorow (co-editor of Boing Boing), Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, law professor and Instapundit blogger Glenn Reynolds, design firm CEO Tim Brown, and yours truly among others, to this question at a new post at his site. A great read with lots of interesting ideas -- I hope those in Washington are paying attention!


Don't Short-cut Planning

My column this week for the Tennessean addresses the importance of following the correct process in developing a business plan:

Many aspiring entrepreneurs turn to the latest business planning software when getting ready to start their businesses, but such tools create too many shortcuts that undermine the crucial process of business planning.

To construct an effective and more accurate business plan, it helps to understand how the experts -- such as investors and bankers -- evaluate business plans.


March 23, 2007

Is There a Medical Device Bubble Waiting to Burst?

We have seen it before. Too much money chasing one particular market segment creates unsustainable valuations that eventually come crashing down -- the medical services roll-up boom and bust of the early 1990s and the dot.com era of the late 1990s.

Medical Design Magazine posted an article earlier this month that points to another possible segment that may be suffering from overvaluation. The story says that as of 2004, 85% of market capitalization in medical device companies was supported by intangible assets. These intangible assets are the speculative part of any business valuation. It is that part of the valuation that predicts what the future might hold.

If speculation proves correct, vast fortunes can be created.

If speculation proves to be unrealistic or just plain wrong, these values can come crashing down. Physicians who sold their practices for stock in the roll-up companies of the early 1990s experienced first-hand what happens when billions of dollars in market cap vanish. So did the millions of people who bought into the intangible assets of the dot.com's. Wealth that was only on paper disappears.

We do not know if this is an overvalued market, or one that has incredible up-side, but it certainly bears watching.

(Thanks to Dr. Jim Stefansic for passing this along).


March 22, 2007

Strange Definition of "Fairness"

Illinois is considering a huge tax increase that is placed squarely on the backs of businesses. It has been labeled "Illinois Tax Fairness" by the Governor.

From the Tax Foundation:

While the plan would phase out the corporate income tax over four years, it would also institute a new gross receipts tax on businesses which is forecast as a net tax increase of $6 billion.

The new tax would be problematic not only because of the additional tax burden it would impose, but also because of the way in which it would do so. Gross receipts taxes are one of the most economically damaging ways for states to extract revenue, and economists from all ends of the political spectrum are nearly unanimous in their opposition to them.

In addition to the gross receipts tax, Governor Blagojevich proposed a new payroll tax on selected companies, bringing the total cost of the plan to $7.1 billion for Illinois taxpayers. If enacted, the tax increase would consume an average of $550 per person in Illinois and...would represent the largest single-year state tax increase this decade.

This gives new meaning to the phrase "tax fairness"!!


Retaining Employees

Several recent surveys of small business owners have found that finding qualified workers is one of the top challenges facing entrepreneurs. In times of growth, employee recruitment becomes even more of a concern. We are not just trying to fill new positions, but also replace openings created by employee turnover. Although it is usually easier and almost always less expensive to retain an existing employee rather than find a replacement, we often fail to take necessary steps to reduce employee turnover.

There are several steps that can be taken to do a better job of meeting employee needs and reducing employee turnover:

- Opportunity to advance as company grows. Growing companies can offer ample opportunities to promote existing employees. Make sure to not just offer the opportunity, but the training and development to make such advancement possible.

- Positive work environment. The positive culture of a small business is what draws many employees to work for you in the beginning. The stresses of growth can often change this part of the culture of a business. Take steps to maintain the culture you intended to create in the early days of the business.

- Achievement and personal satisfaction. Although these are intrinsic factors, they are related to how we design jobs. Keep these things in mind as jobs evolve as your business grows.

- Rewards. Although money is important, it is not the only reward we have to offer. Recognition, status, respect, inclusion, and so forth, are all important rewards to most employees.

- Community. Many small businesses have a sense of "family" about them. Don't underestimate the power of these bonds to retain employees.

- Clear vision that is openly shared. Keep employees informed of where you are headed, and remind them often. The chaos of growth can become overwhelming. Vision can help calm these feelings and help get everyone focused on the tasks at hand. I spent much of my time during our rapid growth traveling throughout our various locations communicating to our staff about our vision and why we needed to grow.

- Security of place in firm as it grows. Many employees leave because they are worried they will not fit in as the business expands. Provide career plans for each employee to help them understand their place in the firm.

- Opportunity for balance in their lives. Although growth may create the need for long hours from every employee from time to time, be sensitive to the strains this can create in employees home lives. Don't take advantage of employees' willingness to pitch in during busy times by making it a standard expectation of their jobs all the time.


March 21, 2007

Capital Gains Tax Cuts May Soon Disappear

The capital gains and marginal tax cuts that have been so important to many small business owners may soon be a thing of the past. Should we blame the new Congress? Should be blame the President? James Pethokoukis says that there is plenty of blame to go around to all of the above.

Most Washington watchers say that the Bush capital gains, dividend, and marginal rate tax cuts would be left to die with only the social policy tax cuts--such as increased child tax credit--standing any chance of surviving. Democrats could easily argue that higher taxes are needed to pay for healthcare reform, Social Security reform, climate change research, public works investment, or reducing income inequality. The major GOP presidential candidates say they intend to preserve the cuts if elected, but if Democrats also control the next Congress, they will have a tough time doing so. Yet here's the thing: If Bush's primary domestic legacy does disappear, he really only has himself ultimately to blame--not Democrats.

Read his column to find out specifically why he blames President Bush as much as he does Congress.


March 20, 2007

Belmont's Entrepreneurship Program Makes the Wall Street Journal

Some of you will remember this song:

But the thrill we've never known

Is the thrill that'll get you when you get your picture

On the cover of the Rolling Stone.

That was kind of how we felt around the Belmont University Center for Entrepreneurship this week. The Wall Street Journal ran a story on the growth in entrepreneurship education around the country, and the story included a couple of quotes about our program. If you go to the video, the opening scenes are of our program.


New Column

This past weekend I started writing a regular column for our local newspaper, the Tennessean. My first column was on moving beyound planning and finding the courage to actually launch a business. Here is a link to that column.

My column is part of a major revamping of the business section for the Tennessean. It will run every other Sunday.


March 19, 2007

An Inspiring Read

For those of you who are interested in exploring the integration of your faith into your business I have a recommendation of an excellent book. Devotional Ventures, edited by Corey Cleek, is an inspiring read. It includes 60 entries by business people of all walks, including -- to my surprise -- my good friend Barry Landis.


Top Technology Trends

MIT's Technology Review offered its Top 10 Emerging Technologies Trends for 2007 in an article from last week. This year's emerging trends includes:

- optical antennas -- a basic technology with potentially broad applications

- metamaterials -- another basic technology with potentially broad applications

- peer-to-peer video -- help save us from a bogged down Internet from the growth in video on the web

- personalized medical monitors -- can help to "simplify and improve medical diagnoses"

- compressive sensing -- "revamp digital imaging systems in cameras and medical scanners"

- nanohealing -- nanotechnology application for medicine

- quantum-dot solar power -- nanotechnology application for solar power

- neuron control -- might "help physicians fine-tune treatments for brain disorders such as depression and Parkinson's disease"

- single-cell analysis -- could "lead directly to predictive tests that could help doctors treat cancers more effectively"

- mobile augmented reality -- combines "location sensors and advanced visual algorithms with cell phones...to help us figure our where we are"

(From the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship).


Corporate Execs Moving to Our World

BusinessWeek Online has a story that profiles 18 women who have left high-power corporate jobs to join the ranks of start-up entrepreneurs. The reason -- "Only 2 of the 18 women on our list mentioned making more money as their primary motivation."

Building a different kind of organizational culture seemed to be a major driving force for many of these women. While still striving for high performance, these new entrepreneurs want to create a more collaborative and team-driven culture. It appears that they also want to create cultures that are more supportive of employees.

Cecelia McCloy, the 52-year-old co-founder of Integrated Science Solutions, a Walnut Creek (Calif.) science and engineering firm with $9 million in sales, says she specifically set out to create a company that was friendly to families. Her employees also get eight hours of paid time off per year to participate in civic or charitable activities -- say, to volunteer in their children's classroom. Last year, about 20 of her 75 employees took advantage of the option. And every month, she asks managers to give her information on employees who did something exceptional for customers or their colleagues. McCloy then writes a thank-you note to those folks.

From our own research for our new book, we have found that these types of goals are also shared by many male entrepreneurs. It is heartening to see entrepreneurs of both genders pursuing such rich and well-ordered definitions of success in their businesses.

(Thanks to Ben Cunningham for passing this along).


March 16, 2007

Some Old Wisdom Worth Remembering

In his classic book, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, the late Peter Drucker gives us the four basic forms of entering new markets. Twenty two years since its publication, this simple yet powerful way of thinking about new ventures is still the best way to understand the strategic options for market entry.

"Fustest with the Mostest"

In today's entrepreneurial world, this is the domain of many venture capital deals. The strategy is one of entering a a market with an aggressive plan and deep pockets. The goal is to get in fast, catching as much market share as possible, before other possible competitors have a chance to react. Your goal is to dominate and control the market. Drucker's perspective on this type of entrepreneurial strategy is that it is high risk, high reward. Given the small number of high potential deals that even get any venture capital funding, and the even smaller percentage that succeed in meeting investors' expectations, Drucker's theory still holds for this category.

"Hit 'em where they Ain't"

This strategy is a bit more cautious. The basic approach here is to watch and learn from the mistakes and lessons of the early entries into the market. Don't go in first, but when you do go in give the market what it really wants. The theory is that we often miss the mark when we first go into a market. There is a steep and expensive learning curve. Drucker says that this strategy is based on the notion that you should let other entrepreneurial ventures bear the cost of that learning curve, and to enter when you can have lower start-up costs and less risk. A variation of this strategy is to take a concept that has been developed and tested by someone else in another market into a new market where it has not been introduced.

The Niche

The most common entry strategy for entrepreneurs is the market niche. In a niche strategy, the entrepreneur finds a small part of a market that is not being served or is significantly under-served. A niche strategy gives the entrepreneur a safer market with less competition and a more dependent market.

Generally, a niche strategy is a good way to enter the market for a new business. It usually takes fewer resources for the start-up, due to lower marketing costs and the ability to start on a smaller scale. Success rates tend to be higher for niche businesses since they have less direct competition. Without much competition, niche businesses can charge higher prices, which allows for quicker positive cash flow during start-up and better margins once profitable.

Changing Values & Characteristics

In this final strategy, the entrepreneur takes an existing product or service and changes its value or some of its core features. This is not a simple tweaking around the edges -- it creates fundamental change. It can include both additions to, but sometimes deletions of features. My favorite example, although dated, was the shift from full-service gasoline filling stations to self-service gas stations. The realization was that what people really wanted was a full tank of gas. All the other stuff, cleaning the windows, checking the oil, etc., were taken away from the "product". People soon viewed the simpler alternative as having better value.

When thinking of a new business, make sure to keep Drucker's strategies in mind when formulating your own market entry strategy.


March 15, 2007

Maybe Family Background Does Not Always Help with Entrepreneurial Drive

Several studies over the past few years have hinted that having grown up in an entrepreneurial family increases the chances that children will grow up to be entrepreneurs.

Dmitri Davydov offers a slightly different hypothesis based on his own experience at a post at Nichegeek.com:

Nearly every super-successful entrepreneur I've met started out dead-broke, too. People raised with a silver spoon in their mouth seldom develop that fire-in-the-gut motivation necessary to achieve great things.

Your thoughts?

(Thanks to Ben Cunningham for this link).


Belmont Student Wins Business Plan Competition

Congratulations to Bryan Vaughan, one of our students here at Belmont, for winning first place in the Self-Employment in the Arts business plan competition held recently in the Chicago area!

paper garder biz card back.jpg

His business is Paper Garden Records, which is described this way at their web site:

Paper Garden Records is a new, fresh and innovative independent label based out of Nashville, Tennessee. Its employees and affiliates boast a vast array of experience and hail from locations around the country. Staff members have spent extensive time working with Sub Pop Records, Saddle Creek Records, EMI Records, and Flatstock, as well as with such events as the Grammy's, SXSW, and CMJ. It is a group of friends dedicated to introducing the music community to the artists and the music they themselves have discovered and fallen in love with.

The label's first signing is Eagle*Seagull from Lincoln, Nebraska. Drawing on influences as diverse as Leonard Cohen and Pavement, the band takes the New York rock scene of recent days, packs it up, and heads west to their roots- making the sound their own with bittersweet melodies, a broken voice, and the plaintive calling of their instruments.


March 14, 2007

Business Ethics Should be More Than Business Rules

While Business Ethics is getting much more attention in the press, in the Board room, and in the classroom, I am concerned that our definition of business ethics is sliding into a legalistic world of rules compliance. I was reminded of this today at morning Mass. The priest was talking about the story of Jesus breaking the rules of the scribes about the Sabbath, through his acts of healing and teaching about the greater good.

We have to be careful not to boil morality, whether it be in everyday life or in business, down to a simple list of don'ts that serves as a checklist of how to be ethical.

Business ethics should so much more than a list of rules to follow. It should be a much broader set of standards of how we treat each other. It is the pursuit of being good in how we treat our employees, our customers, our investors, our families, our suppliers, and so forth. That cannot be boiled down to a simple checklist. Being ethical, being good, is having integrity in all that we do. It requires courage to do what is right toward others, no matter how hard it might be at certain times in our lives.


March 13, 2007

The Importance of Students "Getting Their Hands Dirty"

One of our current students, Bradley Martin, has been involved in the start-up team of a new independently owned restaurant called the Catfish House.

catfish house 1.jpg
catfish house 2.jpg

It is located just up the road from Nashville in Bowling Green, Kentucky. Bradley is a great example of how we try to get our students active in business start-ups -- to get their hands dirty in real entrepreneurial ventures while they are learning about it in the classroom.

I should also note that another student, Cameron Powell, operates the photography and video business that took the promotional pictures you see above. We highlighted Cameron's business in an earlier post.


Instilling the Entrepreneurial Spirit

In preparing our children to face the new entrepreneurial economy, George Anders at StartupJournal argues in a wonderful essay that we need to instill in them a strong sense of self-confidence. And in many ways this translates in an ability to sell.

On a more formal basis, many of us have been urging children for decades to sell Girl Scout cookies, magazine subscriptions and the like. It's hokey, but it's wonderful, too. Parents quietly line up the best sales prospects ahead of time and then send youngsters to call on those friends and neighbors in search of orders. Kids who are energetic and personable come out of the experience believing they are really good at sales.

So much of taking the leap into entrepreneurship and having success early on is tied to these sales skills -- and they can be instilled through the experiences we offer to our children. We need to be able to sell our idea to investors, prospective customers and employees, and even doubtful spouses whose support we desperately need.

Then when you send your children to me when they are ready for college, you will be amazed how far we can help them go!


March 12, 2007

Tax Reform Outlook Looks Bleak

James Pethokoukis writes that McCain has joined the list of Republican Presidential candidates advocating tax cuts that includes Romney, Giuliani, and Brownback. It seems that McCain has gone so far as to confer with Arthur Laffer.

But none of their plans for our tax system include real tax reform.

So far, though, none of the main GOP contenders have gone further than advocating an extension of the Bush tax cuts beyond 2010.

The growing burden of the current tax system, not just the various marginal tax rates within the laberynth that is our tax code, is as much or more of a worry to small business owners than the effective tax rates.

As the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA Thomas M. Sullivan stated in recent remarks he made before the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS:

Small businesses currently shoulder exceedingly high tax compliance costs. In fact, according to a recently updated Advocacy sponsored cost of regulations study, tax compliance costs employers with less than 20 employees a total of $1304 per employee as compared to employers with 500 or more employees which incur $780 per employee to comply with Federal taxes. Put another way, small entities pay 40% more for tax compliance than employers with 500 or more employees.

That's right, $1304 per employee for a business with 20 employees. That is unproductive spending, $26,080 on average, that with a simple and fair tax system could be spent on another employee, higher wages, investment in new equipment, etc., etc. This is not taxes, it is just money spent to comply with the tax code. Taxes then fall on top of that amount!


March 08, 2007

Proposed Alternative Minimum Tax Solution Will Create Different Problems

James Pethokoukis examines the Democrats attempt to "fix" the problems of the Alternative Minimum Tax in a recent post at his blog at US News. It seems they are busy trying to find a way to "pay" for this long-needed reform. Some of the ideas being explored include: 1) significantly increase the number of tax payers in the top 35% income tax bracket, 2) limit the deductible part of mortgages to the first $1 million, or 3) limit the deductibility of state and local income taxes.

In their analysis of the AMT debate, the Tax Foundation puts it in perspective:

The problem with AMT is that it should be unnecessary in the first place. The reason that AMT was created in 1969 was that a few wealthy individuals were paying nothing in federal income taxes. These wealthy individuals were earning income in ways that were tax-free, and were made tax-free explicitly by Congress. But instead of simply eliminating these loopholes that created this problem in the first place, Congress decided to create a complex parallel tax system that still allowed these loopholes for certain people, but tried to ensure everyone paid some tax amount. But overall, all Congress created was an even bigger mess.

Today, however, these loopholes aren't the main reason people are being hit with AMT. The two biggest tax take-away preferences putting people into AMT today are the state and local tax deduction and personal exemptions. The solution to AMT should be fundamental tax reform that addresses the issue in two ways: (1) Most of the preferences that are taken away by AMT should not be in the tax code in the first place, and (2) All income should be treated equally, thereby eliminating any loophole Congress created in the past.

Or better yet, let's scrap the current income tax system and replace it with the Fair Tax or some other politically neutral revenue system. However, that would take away the politicians' favorite way to vie for attention, money and votes. What we have for a tax system right now is a political playground in which elected officials pander to voting blocks and the media.


March 06, 2007

Thoughts from the Robert Trent Jones Trail

I have been working on my tee shots for the past two years -- to no avail -- until this week. A little adjustment in my swing (courtesy of my son) and all of a sudden I am finally smacking it off the tee box again. But alas, as soon as that problem is corrected, my faithful wedges have abandoned me. Which reminded me of something from my days as an entrepreneur....

As soon as we got through one crisis in our business, it seemed another reared its ugly head. It was a pattern that seemed to occur over and over.

I guess the continual challenge of the next crisis or problem is one of the things that makes golf -- and entrepreneurship -- so fascinating. Perfection is an unrealistic goal for either pursuit.

*******

If you are a golfer and have never played any of the Robert Trent Jones Golf Trail in Alabama I cannot give it a strong enough recommendation. The courses are beautiful and challenging and the service is great. They are also a real bargain! Add it to your to-do list.


Web Resources for Entrepreneurs

Here is a great listing of various web-based resources for entrepreneurs put together by Marcus Zillman.


So Who's Right?

We keep hearing that small business owners are optimistic. The latest comes from the Discover Small Business Watch poll (via Rasmussen Reports).

"Small business owners are often the first to feel the effects of changes in the larger economy, so we believe they are an important barometer to track," said Sastry Rachakonda, director of Discover's small business credit card. "Based on our Watch numbers, economic confidence appears to be steady. However, cash flow is something to keep an eye on when it comes to small business indicators."

Those who watch Wall Street are beginning to see ominous signs. It all started in a big public way when Alan Greenspan opened his pie whole and suggested that a recession was on the horizon. The stock market reacted quickly. Now we are beginning to hear speculation on how this impending recession would impact the 2008 election.

So which barometer is correct -- Main Street's confidence or Wall Street's nervous investors?


March 05, 2007

Bruins are Dancin' and I'm Goin' Golfing

March brings two things in the world of academia -- basketball tournaments and spring break.

belmont wins.jpg

First, hats off to the Belmont Men's basketball team for making it two straight years to the Big Dance! Go Bruins! Hopefully our women will follow-up next weekend with another tournament birth.

rtjgt.jpg

I am taking a few days to play a few of the Robert Trent Jones Golf Trail courses down in Alabama with our son for our spring break. (To my students -- Yes, I also will be grading your business plans). My blogging will be a little hit and miss this week...


March 01, 2007

Survey is Out of Touch

While the Kauffman Foundation does a lot of good work for entrepreneurship, their annual ranking of the states is once again wrong -- dead wrong! If you want to read the report you can get it here (but it is a very long pdf).

Why is it wrong? First, they continue to define the "New Economy" in terms of only high-tech, high-potential businesses. While they are important, they are only one small part of the much broader entrepreneurial economic revolution. Remember that only a small fraction of a percent of start-ups are even on the radar of venture capital. It is an elitest model of entrepreneurship.

Second, they are in the corner of those who favor socialized entrepreneurship. They are of the school of thought that believes that government knows best when it comes to economic planning. So they they measure entrepreneurial climate primarily in terms of public spending.

Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington and California lead their list, which should tell you something about the survey's bias. These states spend a lot on eduction and have huge grants and subsidies for selected tech sectors. But in terms of small business development, several of these states rank very low. Among the bottom states in their ranking is South Dakota, which ranks high in all surveys that look at actual business start-ups and those policy factors that have proven to lead to more entrepreneurial activity (taxes and regulation).