Belmont University

Nationalized Healthcare: Expedient But Wrong

This morning I attended a small business summit sponsored by the new mayor of Nashville, Karl Dean. An overflow crowd heard remarks from the Mayor, the state director of NFIB Jim Brown, and the head of the Nashville Chamber of Commerce Ralph Schulz on the needs of the over 530,000 small businesses here in Tennessee.

Jim Brown of the NFIB talked about the need for less regulation on small business -- a good goal that boosts start-up activity. He also talked about the need for lower taxes and how -- another noble goal. However, in the same breath he warned us that the current tax shortfalls we are seeing across the country as the economy slows do not bode well for entrepreneurs. It seems that there is a disturbing pattern during times like these. Local and state governments go after more revenue from small business owners through taxes and fees to offset the overall drop in sales tax revenues.

But then came a major disconnect for me when he shifted his remarks to health care. Rather than trust the free markets that he so strongly advocates for on behalf of his small business members, Brown applauded our Governor's expansion of the state-run health insurance program to include small businesses through a new program called "CoverTN."

We are seeing this across the country. It started when large corporations such as Walmart began to lead the charge for a federal government healthcare program as a fix for the current healthcare crisis. Large corporations began to signal that they would support a nationalized healthcare policy. Then, advocates for small businesses began to fall right in line.

It amazes me that those who advocate lower taxes and less regulation on one hand are willing to support the enactment of a national healthcare plan that would create a gigantic bureaucratic black-hole of taxes on the other hand. Governmental meddling in healthcare delivery and payment in large part created the healthcare system crisis. So now we are willing to hand the entire healthcare system over to that same government lock, stock and barrel in the name of political expediency?


|

Comments

It doesn't amaze me: most businesses want to privatize profits while socializing expenses and that's what nationalized healthcare is.

Not being able to see the implications, well that's just a human fault. By the name it comes around to nationalizing the distribution of big screen TVs the execs at WalMart would have cashed out by then.

I would hope that at least some entrepreneurs will wake up and understand the folly of the direction we are headed in. I used to say that we had a choice between a gentle stroll toward socialism from the Republicans versus a full spring offered by the Democrats. I am beginning to think both sides have picked up their pace trying to take us in that direction!

oh good, more unfounded, completely speculative claims of knowing exactly what the follees of socialized healthcare. What evidence of meddling do you have? Its the private insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies that have meddled. Look it up.

Speculative? Hardly! As broken as our system is, we still have a large number of people from Canada, England, etc., etc. coming into the US because their socialized system does not allow timely access for many treatments.

Read all of my posts on this topic before you lump me into the "status quo" crowd for healthcare. You and I agree that large corporations in duplicitous arrangements with the government have created the helathcare crisis in the US.

Where we differ is in what to do. Socializing the system will only make it worse. A free and open system will help our healthcare system once again become innovative, efficient and effective.

Tap it in and Comment, Please

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)