Belmont University

Is New Tax Needed for War?

James Pethokoukis of US News & World Report has a post at his blog about an idea for a new tax that is being talked about in DC. Sen. Joseph Lieberman is suggesting that we should consider a new tax to fund what could be a long-term war on terror.

As Mr. Pethokoukis writes in his post:

What lawmakers might want to consider instead is what if anything they can do to keep economic productivity high --or even boost it to greater heights. Robust worker output is why the U.S. economy has been as strong as it has been in recent years. According to new data out this morning from the Labor Department, worker productivity rose 2.2 percent in 2006, continuing a string of strong annual gains starting in 1998. Yet the increases in 2005 and 2006, though solid, were more than a point below the increases seen from 2000 through 2004. Getting productivity back to those levels is a goal both Republicans and Democrats can agree on.

Indeed! And much of this growth is coming from small businesses, which benefit most from lower taxes and a simple and fair tax system. Let's not complicate things with more specific taxes or additional targeted tax cuts. 60,000 pages of tax code and 600 active tax forms is already stifling our growth potential -- let's not add more complexity on to our existing mess.


|

Comments

Amen.

You might also be interested in this article from the Dallas Morning News financial columnist, Scott Burns.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/scottburns/columns/2007/stories/DN-burns_28bus.ART.State.Edition1.1cbab70.html

Turns out that we're already effectively paying a flat tax in the US. 40 percent!

You have to register to read the article, so here are the important paragraphs:

In a study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston University economists Laurence J. Kotlikoff and David Rapson have found that our all-in marginal tax rate is pushing 40 percent.

Yes, you read that right: 40 percent.

Earlier studies by the Congressional Budget Office showed lower figures.

But those studies failed to include state income taxes, sales taxes and the offsetting benefits of major government programs. This research incorporates all those factors and shows our real tax burden.

It's 40 percent, give or take a bit.

That's not our average tax rate. It is what most workers will pay on each additional dollar of income when all taxes – federal income, employment, state income, sales taxes and the major benefit programs – are considered. Worse, the researchers found that it is about the same on a life-cycle basis, meaning that future Social Security and Medicare benefits won't offset the burden of current taxes.

Tap it in and Comment, Please

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)