Belmont University

Some Thoughts From a Walk

Its funny how things converge once in a while. I was thinking about the economist Schumpeter on our morning walk this morning. (Sorry honey...I promise it was in one of those quiet moments between our conversations during our walk). Schumpeter is credited as being the first economist who captured the power and process of entrepreneurship in the economy. He coined the phrase creative destruction to describe what entrepreneurs do. It is the process of innovation, which is what fuels long-term economic growth. As we come up with new ideas, old products and services become obsolete and fall by the wayside.

I was thinking that it was like the ill-fated policy we had in the US to prevent any and all forest fires at all costs. We've now learned that the seeming destruction caused by forest fires is actually vital in keeping the forest healthy over the long term. By fighting the fires, thinking we were helping preserve the forests, we were actually hurting the forests ability to continuously regenerate itself. The forest fires were the process of creative destruction for the forests!

I was thinking about how the power structure that has been created by large public corporations and the government over the past decades fights natural economic progress and change. Through their power, corporations attempt to institutionalize what they make and protect it through legislation. It is like the fire fighters thinking that preserving what is right now is actually best for the economy. It is not.

If you think about it, that is a big part of the reason that we continue with gasoline powered transportation even though we know it can't last and hope and pray that we can get out of our dependence. But the industries tied to gasoline-based transportation, and the government that has become their partners, do what ever they can to fight off the natural process of creative destruction that should be moving our economy to its next stage of development.

Anyway, I get home this morning and there in the inbox of my e-mails is link from one of my favorite local blog visitors, Ben Cunningham, to a post that has a quote from George Gilder. Now George Gilder is one of my favorite modern day writers. He tends to spend most of his time writing about technology, but often wanders into broader issues. For example, one of my all time favorite essays, The Soul of Silicon, is an article that he wrote based on a talk he gave at the Vatican. It was in the no longer published magazine Forbes ASAP (creative destruction at work -- ASAP died with the death of the dot.coms). I recommend you read it several times. There is so much going on in this article that you will not capture it all in one read.

So here is the quote from Gilder that Ben sent to me this morning:

As entrepreneurs accelerate the processes of creative destruction that impel all economic advance, the economists measure the destruction but not the creativity.... So countries that multiply the production of well-defined and well-catalogued products of the past -- from subsidized steel ingots to protected automobiles -- will seem to grow faster than countries that multiply entrepreneurs and innovations.

Now this is getting really odd. The quote from Gilder, one of my all time favorites writers, sent to me by one of my favorite local blog visitors, quotes my favorite economist, Schumpeter, in relation to something I had just been thinking about on my walk with my favorite person. As governments amass too much power they seem to fight the creative destruction process vital to sustain an entrepreneurial economy. Over-regulation hampers and can even destroy the natural process of creative destruction. The politicians are like the fire fighters preventing the natural economic burn-off needed to keep our economy moving forward and evolving as it has to do to stay strong.

I told you that it is strange how things like this all come together sometimes....


|

Comments

Corporations can be catalysts for deregulation as well. eBay has gone state to state to make sure its sellers could participate without having to become licensed auctioneers. eBay is the most likely catalyst for turning the tide against draconian automobile dealer franchise laws. With Costco, eBay may also make a difference in opening up the casket business.

But of course, eBay was a proponent of net neutrality regulations one week, and then the next, decided the principle didn't apply to accceptable payment methods for auctions it hosts.

So whats to be done with this big animal that we call government. Has it grow so enormous and tedious that there is no way to get it to behave in our best interest. It appears as though our government exhibits what corporastions would call "agency theory". It can be argued that our government does not act in their shareholders best interest. Why is it that we continue to let them behave in ways that are not in our best interest. Time and again, we know things are not as they should be and yet we put the same folks back into their positions to do as they chose. We vote them into office or worse yet do not vote at all. How bad do things have to get before we demand a change. How much do we have to pay to fill up our tanks before we insist on another energy source. Don't you think we could find it if we had to or are we just lazy, don't care or worse, apathetic?

Politicians just want to get re-elected, this is their primary concern ~ Henry Ford drove a new economy through creative destruction and now we blame government for prescribing regulation over the plastic utensils that we continue to feed our insatiable appetite for the SUV's that are required to haul our fat !##%$ around. Yeah, I'd say things come together; the sad thing is they seem to melt behind the red tape! Got scissors?

The modes of exchange Gilder describes remind me of Charles Williams' description of the exchanges in City of God. Thomas Howard says "these exchanges are modes of joy." I guess Howard and Williams are a bit over my head, but I find it inspiring to view our "entrepreneurial challenge" in this way.

As usual, the government and our society has gotten in the way of natural progression. Though I am an accountant--I believe in less rules and more accountability (judgement calls) by those in charge. If we, as a society, felt accountable for our actions-or abuses of natural resources, we would have already forced new technology to replace the old.
Of course, if we were smart enough to do that, we would have stopped cutting down the forrests long ago so that we could afford to let them regenerate. More governance is not the answer for entreprenuers--but, as history shows, we continue to allow bad decisions to govern us even when there is ample evidence to the contrary.

Tap it in and Comment, Please

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)